TLDR: The recent discussions surrounding the Stake the Bridge (STB) proposal on Polygon have sparked significant debate within the DeFi community. The proposal aimed to deploy approximately $1.3 billion in stablecoins from Polygon's PoS bridge into DeFi protocols to generate yield. Many community members expressed apprehension about the proposal, highlighting potential risks associated with deploying user funds without explicit consent. Concerns were raised about the security of such large-scale deployments and the implications for user trust.
The STB proposal has underscored the importance of transparent governance, user consent, and collaboration within the DeFi ecosystem. It serves as a reminder that the deployment of user funds requires meticulous consideration of security, user trust, and the foundational principles of decentralization.
The recent debate surrounding the Stake the Bridge (STB) proposal on Polygon has brought to light critical themes that deserve thoughtful discussion: governance integrity, user fund protection, and the principles of decentralization.
At the heart of the matter lies a fundamental question:
Should bridge funds—assets belonging to users—be appropriated for yield generation without explicit user consent?
The Context
1. Polygon Labs explored a proposal to invest bridge assets into DeFi, ostensibly to drive returns and growth for the ecosystem. Partners such as Aave and Morpho were considered for this initiative.
2. Aave initially lobbied to manage these funds but faced competition when Morpho introduced a differentiated approach that emphasized decentralization, incentives, and simplified infrastructure.
3. Tensions escalated when a proposal surfaced from Aave leadership suggesting discontinuing Aave’s deployment on Polygon PoS—sparking allegations of anti-competitive behavior.
This is what Sandeep Nailwal, founder of Polygon says:
https://x.com/sandeepnailwal/status/1869153510756909475
And this is what Stani Kulechov, founder of Aave says: https://x.com/StaniKulechov/status/1869182600008679563
Governance Must Reflect User Consent
This situation underscores an essential principle of DeFi: Assets on bridges do not belong to protocols, governance councils, or developers. They belong to the users. Governance proposals that leverage these funds—no matter how well-intentioned—must first ensure the explicit buy-in of users.
The Polygon community's resounding rejection of the STB proposal is a win for governance. It highlights the community's ability to voice concerns and safeguard principles of decentralization.
Where Aave and Morpho Stand
Both Aave and Morpho acted within their mandate to pursue growth and serve their users. Competition is healthy, but it must align with the ethos of Web3—transparency, decentralization, and user sovereignty:
-
Aave raised valid concerns around security and risk management. With significant Polygon TVL in Aave markets, their focus on user protection is commendable.
-
Morpho distinguished itself by offering decentralization and incentives tailored for Polygon's ecosystem, sparking genuine community interest.
However, framing competitive proposals as existential threats or retaliatory measures does not serve the broader interests of the ecosystem. As we’ve seen, such moves risk destabilizing user trust rather than fostering healthy collaboration.
A Collaborative Path Forward
The DeFi ecosystem thrives when protocols work together transparently to solve real user problems. This situation is a lesson for governance across the board:
-
User assets must never be leveraged without their consent.
-
Competition must prioritize innovation, not intimidation.
-
Leadership across projects—whether Polygon, Aave, or Morpho—must commit to collaboration and uphold the principles of decentralization.
The Polygon community has demonstrated its strength in rejecting proposals that don’t align with these principles. Now is the time to double down on innovation, collaboration, and user trust.
Refs links:
Cointelegraph